Question 191 · 341 in bank
A team member has made a mistake on a project. How should the scrum master address the mistake?
Show answer
Answer: C
PMI Agile Certified Practitioner341 questions across 35 pages are complete and free, with no account or card.
341 questions in this bank
Free access · progress saved on this device
A team member has made a mistake on a project. How should the scrum master address the mistake?
Answer: C
For what is the MoSCoW method used?
Answer: B
During a retrospective, a team member claims that a specific set of documentation that is continuously updated during iterations is not being used by any stakeholder. What should the team do?
Answer: A
Continuous Improvement: This method aligns with the agile principle of continuous improvement, as it encourages the team to regularly evaluate and enhance their processes and outputs.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — thewalker
An agile team has started to worry because lately they have seen an increase in the number of issues. There seems to be a large variance in the quality of the work items delivered. The team now realizes that a shared understanding of quality may not exist among team members. What should the team do?
Answer: C
One of the senior stakeholders on a project did not want to be engaged on a daily basis. During the iteration, the team encounters complexities but are convinced these issues can be resolved in time for the demo. What should the agile practitioner do?
Answer: A
Transparency: Agile principles emphasize transparency and open communication. Keeping stakeholders informed about the project's status, including any issues or complexities, is crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring that everyone is on the same page. Stakeholder Engagement: Even if a senior stakeholder does not want to be engaged daily, it is still important to keep them informed about significant issues that could impact the project's outcome. This helps in managing expectations and allows for timely interventions if needed. Risk Management: By being transparent, the team can also ensure that any potential risks are communicated early, allowing for better risk management and mitigation strategies. Team Confidence: While the team’s confidence in resolving the issues is important, it should not override the need for transparency. Stakeholders should be aware of the current status to make informed decisions.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — thewalker
While planning, what prioritization factors need to be considered for a minimally marketable feature (MMF)?
Answer: B
A newly formed, colocated team is participating in daily standups, but is otherwise working largely as individual contributors. This has resulted in misalignment of activities. Planned velocity is being met. What should the agile practitioner do?
Answer: A
An agile team is struggling with an issue. A team member mentions that another team had a similar issue that was resolved, but lessons learned documents are unavailable. What should the agile practitioner do?
Answer: C
Over the last two sprints, a number of potential problems have threatened the team's ability to hit the targeted release date. What should the agile practitioner do?
Answer: C
One of the overseas stakeholders on an agile project has not been actively involved in the project's development. What would be the first step to reengage the stakeholder?
Answer: D
Keyboard:J Kmove between questionsA–Dselect an answerRshow or hide the answer← →change page
PMI-ACP practice, question 191. 341 questions available.
Version 1.0.0. How we source questions