Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)578 questions across 58 pages are complete and free, with no account or card.
578 questions in this bank
Free access · progress saved on this device
Refer to the exhibit. Which action makes 10.1.3.2 the feasible successor to reach 10.200.1.0/24 for location S42T431E64F51?
Answer: C
I don't believe D is correct the question asks to make the the route to 10.1.3.2 the feasible successor not the successor
Source: Adapted from community discussion — ccnptoppler34
Refer to the exhibit A junior engineer updated a branch router configuration. Immediately after the change, the engineer receives calls from the help desk that branch personnel cannot reach any network destinations. Which configuration restores service and continues to block 10.1.1.100/32?
Answer: C
I got tricked by not reading properly. Remember that a prefix list and a route map have an implicit deny at the end of their entries. The prefix list is permitting the host prefix so that it can be processed by the Route map. And it purposely leaves the implicit deny because the Route map only processes that host to deny it. However, the Route map implicitly denies everything else preventing other routes from being installed in the RIB
Source: Adapted from community discussion — [Removed]
What does the MP-BGP OPEN message contain?
Answer: A
The OPEN message contains the BGP version number, ASN of the originating router, Hold Time, BGP Identifier, and other optional parameters that establish the session capabilities.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — DUBC89x
Refer to the exhibit. The neighbor relationship is not coming up. Which two configurations bring the adjacency up? (Choose two.)
Answer: CD
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer applies a prefix-list filter that filters most of the network 10 prefixes instead of allowing them. Which action resolves the issue?
Answer: D
I would say the question describes the issue is engineer intend to permit 10.0.0.0/8 networks but only 10.0.0.0/8 left, other precise subnet like 10.1.1.0/24 missed. how to fix it. then we can say option D is the correct answer.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — ClaudeYun
How is a preshared key “Test” for all the remote VPN routers configured in a DMVPN using GRE over IPsec set up?
Answer: D
vIOS(config)#crypto isakmp ? aggressive-mode Disable ISAKMP aggressive mode client Set client configuration policy default ISAKMP default policy disconnect-revoked-peers Disconnect Crypto Session with Revoked Peer enable Enable ISAKMP fragmentation IKE Fragmentation enabled if required identity Set the identity which ISAKMP will use invalid-spi-recovery Initiate IKE and send Invalid SPI Notify keepalive Set a keepalive interval for use with IOS peers key Set pre-shared key for remote peer
Source: Adapted from community discussion — HarwinderSekhon
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is trying to get 192.168.32.100 forwarded through 10.1.1.1, but it was forwarded through 10.1.1.2. What action forwards the packets through 10.1.1.1?
Answer: D
Please ignore previous post, got mixed up. ip prefix-list IntoEIGRP seq 10 permit 192.168.32.0/19 ge /24 -> /24, 25, 26...
Source: Adapted from community discussion — HungarianDish_111
What is a characteristic of IPv6 RA Guard?
Answer: D
Correct: IPv6 RA Guard operates at Layer 2 and is designed to filter out rogue Router Advertisement (RA) messages from unauthorized sources. However, it is unable to inspect or filter RA messages that are encapsulated within tunnels (e.g., IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnels), since these messages would bypass the Layer 2 filtering mechanism.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — tubirubs
A network administrator is troubleshooting a failed AAA login issue on a Cisco Catalyst c3560 switch. When the network administrator tries to log in with SSH using TACACS+ username and password credentials, the switch is no longer authenticating and is failing back to the local account. Which action resolves this issue?
Answer: C
Which two solutions are used to overcome a flapping link that causes a frequent label binding exchange between MPLS routers? (Choose two.)
Answer: DE
To avoid having to rebuild the LDP session altogether, you can protect it. When the LDP session between two directly connected LSRs is protected, a targeted LDP session is built between the two LSRs. When the directly connected link does go down between the two LSRs, the targeted LDP session is kept up as long as an alternative path exists between the two LSRs. For the protection to work, you need to enable it on both the LSRs. If this is not possible, you can enable it on one LSR, and the other LSR can accept the targeted LDP Hellos by configuring the command mpls ldp discovery targeted-hello accept. Reference: https://www.ccexpert.us/mpls-network/mpls-ldp-session-protection.htmlOr from the referenceat https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/us/docs/2019/pdf/5eU6DfQV/TECMPL-3201.pdfTroubleshooting LDP IssuesProblem: I. When a link flaps (for a short time), …S olution: + When LDP session supported by link hello is setup, create a targeted hello to protect the session.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — DUBC89x
Keyboard:J Kmove between questionsA–Dselect an answerRshow or hide the answer← →change page
300-410 practice, question 271. 578 questions available.
Version 1.0.0. How we source questions