Question 261 · 341 in bank
Toward the end of a project, the product owner discovers that the project has a high probability of failure due to a critical feature not functioning as expected. What should the product owner do?
Show answer
Answer: B
PMI Agile Certified Practitioner341 questions across 35 pages are complete and free, with no account or card.
341 questions in this bank
Free access · progress saved on this device
Toward the end of a project, the product owner discovers that the project has a high probability of failure due to a critical feature not functioning as expected. What should the product owner do?
Answer: B
An agile coach is assigned to help a project team that was recently co-located close to a very popular business. Many team members visit this business during working hours which affects team performance. What should the agile coach do to mitigate this issue?
Answer: C
the answer should be C. the question is relevant to "working agreements". we have to discuss with team about working agreements
Source: Adapted from community discussion — zvasanth1
After completing the release plan, the team realizes that the project is very likely to have a negative ROI. What should the team do?
Answer: C
I believe C is the correct answer: Please note that the question is talking about the TEAM and not just the DEVELOPMENT TEAM. The team includes everyone. C. Perform a root-cause analysis to remove waste from the delivery process and increase the ROI: Why the team thinks the project will not have a positive ROI? That is the question the team needs to ask and figure out the root cause for the project not being successful. There could be many reasons, for instance: The project itself may not bring in any value to the organization, or too many unnecessary features have been added to the project and etc...The team needs to find out the problem and figure out the solutions to propose to the stakeholders before anything (like; reaching out to the stakeholders and re-prioritizing the backlog).
Source: Adapted from community discussion — InvisibleBeing
During planning for the next iteration, an agile team identifies most of the story points that are expected to be delivered. How should an agile practitioner work with the team to help identify the iteration's remaining scope?
Answer: C
During a project meeting, a team is faced with a difficult decision. After discussion and deliberation, the project leader makes the final decision and ends the discussion. This causes a team member to withdraw from future collaboration. How could the project leader have avoided this?
Answer: A
During sprint planning the product owner wants the team to prioritize and deliver a number of features which have the highest business value. Due to technical dependencies, the team does not agree with the prioritization. What should the project leader do?
Answer: C
C is correct. The team should capture all risks and dependencies in the product backlog, and then prioritize the risk /dependencies based on the sprint goal in every sprint. It cannot be A, because doing work without dependencies is not the priority in Agile, the priority is the most valuable feature/stories. What if all highly valuable features have dependencies? In this case the team needs to capture and manage risks/dependencies as per the Sprint Goal.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — InvisibleBeing
During a project review, the team discovers customer feedback that would add scope. The project leader is concerned that the team will be unable to incorporate this feedback and still meet the product launch date. What should the project leader do?
Answer: C
An Agile team is under pressure to deliver an application. The product owner anticipates many change requests from customers once the product is released. What should the agile team do?
Answer: B
An agile team is preparing a release plan for a project. What information will the team need to complete this plan?
Answer: C
A. Individual user story effort: Knowing the effort required for individual user stories helps with backlog prioritization within each iteration, but it doesn't directly determine the overall iteration capacity. B. Team member individual work: Understanding individual team member capacity is helpful for resource allocation and workload balancing within the team, but it doesn't provide the whole picture of the team's collective capacity in an iteration. D. Entire team work: Knowing the total team capacity across all iterations can be helpful for long-term planning, but it's too broad for building the specific iteration-based release plan.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — chlaithem
Why should a project team reduce the work in progress?
Answer: C
WIP limits improve throughput and reduce the amount of work "nearly done", by forcing the team to focus on a smaller set of tasks
Source: Adapted from community discussion — Edgarrt
Keyboard:J Kmove between questionsA–Dselect an answerRshow or hide the answer← →change page
PMI-ACP practice, question 261. 341 questions available.
Version 1.0.0. How we source questions