Question 461 · 856 in bank
A company's help desk received several AV alerts indicating Mimikatz attempted to run on the remote systems. Several users also reported that the new company flash drives they picked up in the break room only have 512KB of storage. Which of the following is most likely the cause?
Show answer
Answer: D
Explanation
The GPO blocking the flash drives is being bypassed by a malicious flash drive that is attempting to harvest plaintext credentials from memory. The presence of Mimikatz alerts and reports of new company flash drives having only 512KB of storage indicate a potential security incident involving malicious activity. Mimikatz is a well-known tool used for extracting plaintext passwords and other sensitive information from memory, which could indicate an attempt to compromise the security of the systems. Additionally, the fact that the new flash drives have been tampered with and do not have their original storage capacity suggests that a malicious actor is using the flash drives to bypass the Group Policy Object (GPO) settings that block the use of flash drives. This could be an attempt to introduce malware or exfiltrate data using unauthorized hardware.
Source: Adapted from community discussion — ApplebeesWaiter1122