Question 181 · 427 in bank
Select 2A company has set up AWS CodeArtifact repositories with public upstream repositories. The company's development team consumes open source dependencies from the repositories in the company's internal network. The company's security team recently discovered a critical vulnerability in the most recent version of a package that the development team consumes. The security team has produced a patched version to fix the vulnerability. The company needs to prevent the vulnerable version from being downloaded. The company also needs to allow the security team to publish the patched version. Which combination of steps will meet these requirements? (Choose two.)
Show answer
Answer: CD
Explanation
I had this question in my exam and checking what was the correct option for the package version led me here. C - archived seems to be the right one. A - unlisted will only remove the package version from the list of versions returned to package managers, but it WILL NOT prevent the download. B - deleted - it's not a valid package version status (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeartifact/latest/ug/packages-overview.html#package-version-status) C - archived - will block the package version download. D - Allow direct publishing will give the internal team permissions to upload the new version of the package E - block direct publishing means the package version are updated from external (public) repos More on the packages origin control settings here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeartifact/latest/ug/package-origin-controls.html
Source: Adapted from community discussion — Weninka